You are a graduate student at Aldenmere University, hired to catalog the estate papers of Lionel Cavanaugh — collector, philanthropist, patron of the arts.                                                                                    

His papers were left to the university with one condition: once cataloged, they are to be sealed for ten years.

You are three days in. Names, dates, words... Something in this archive is very wrong — and someone went to great lengths to make sure no one would notice.                                                 

28 documents. Letters, receipts, legal correspondence, personal writings, newspaper clippings.                              

All of them are available from the start. There is no gating, no locked progression, no hand-holding. You read. You clip evidence. You take notes. And when you think you know what happened, you file your assessment — a report with 14 blanks, every answer typed by hand.

Get something wrong? No answers shown. Go back and look harder.

---                                                                                                                         

How to Play:                                                                                                                

                                                            

  1. Read — Browse the archive. 28 documents, any order. Not everything is relevant.                                          

  2. Clip — Click any sentence to pin it to your evidence board.

  3. Tag — Use five color tags to organize evidence however you like.

  4. Notes — Write your theories in the notepad. It saves automatically.

  5. File — When you're ready, file your assessment. Every blank is typed. No hints. No multiple choice.                      

---                                                                                                                         

If you enjoyed Epitaph, this is the next step. Same philosophy — pure deduction, no filler — but with a new story, new  mechanics, and harder puzzles. The conspiracy is different. The documents are different. The answers require synthesis, not just recall.                                                                                                                

Published 21 hours ago
StatusReleased
PlatformsHTML5
Rating
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars
(1 total ratings)
AuthorChickenOrEgg
GenreInteractive Fiction
Tagsbrowser, deduction, Detective, document, investigation, Mystery, Narrative, Short, Singleplayer
AI DisclosureAI Assisted, Code

Comments

Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.

YES. More games like this, please! Rot 13: Jung n fgbel! Htu, cbbe Ryran. Nf fbba nf V fnj gung fur’q sbhaq gur qvfpercnapvrf va “Jbzna va Oyhr”, V jnf yvxr tvey, trg BHG juvyr lbh fgvyy pna yby

V jnf ubarfgyl fhecevfrq fur yvirq nf ybat nf fur qvq nsgre ur gbbx ure wbheany. Naq gur yrggre unccrarq n pbhcyr lrnef orsber ure qrngu. V jbaqre jul ur jnvgrq fb ybat nsgre gung gb fgntr gur “nppvqrag”? V qba’g xabj vs fur orpnzr n HF pvgvmra qhevat gubfr 30 lrnef, be ubj znal gvzrf n jbex ivfn pna or erarjrq - ohg vs ur fcbafberq ure jbex ivfn gur ragver gvzr…fur ernyyl jnf genccrq ba uvf rfgngr :(

Naq jub qrpvqrq jr fubhyq frr gur cncref?! V ubcr gur zhfgnpur-gjveyvat, fbnc bcren eriratr gjvfg vf gung Znetbg yrnxrq vg fbzrubj unun

V unq 12/14 ng svefg; gur qngrf fghzcrq zr, fb vg jnf n tbbq vqrn gb xrrc fbzr qbphzragf bhg bs puebabybtvpny beqre. I liked having the chance to go back and look again without losing everything I’d already typed. I tried to be precise with my answers, but having a bit of leeway on that was very helpful.

I didn’t use the tags, plus I started writing stuff down in my handy dandy notebook and forgot to use the in-game notepad! I’ll have to remember to do so next time :)